Jonathan Moeller, Pulp Writer

The books of Jonathan Moeller

administratasciencescience fiction

Opinions IN SPACE!

A very persistent reader emailed to ask my opinion as science fiction writer on 1.) the US government’s report on UFO sightings, and 2.) billionaires like Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos launching themselves into space.

Granted, I myself would not come to a science fiction writer for a reliable opinion on anything. 🙂

But here’s what I think.

UFO SIGHTINGS: The US government recently released a report on UAF (unidentified aerial phenomenon) that basically said the US military has been seeing weird flying things it can’t explain. People have proposed explanations ranging from space aliens, to secret Russian aircraft, to angels as they are described in the Book of Ezekiel.

While I concede it is possible that the UAF are space aliens or angels heralding the Second Coming (especially after the last two years), I think it is more likely that they are a natural phenomenon we currently don’t yet have the instruments or the mental models to understand. A good example of this process is the “canals” of Mars. Early astronomers observed what they believed to be canals on Mars’ surface. Later generations of astronomers had better instruments, which later revealed that the canals were in fact optical illusions caused by the weaker telescopes of the 19th century. Or the aurora borealis – in ancient times, people had dozens of potential religious and natural explanations for them, but thanks to modern tools, we know that they’re caused by charged particles hitting Earth’s magnetosphere. Another example would be the Ptolemaic view of the universe, which states at the Earth is the fixed center of the cosmos and everything revolves around it. That explanation makes perfect sense using information gathered by the naked eye, but the people of the ancient world didn’t have the tools or the mental models to get closer to the truth.

I suspect something similar is underway with the UAF. Probably they are a natural phenomenon that has always existed, but it is only within the last 80 years that humans have had aircraft that can fly high enough to see them. Perhaps in another hundred years people will have instruments and theories that can explain UAF, and they will be no more mysterious than the aurora borealis.

BILLIONAIRE SPACEFLIGHT: I don’t have a strong opinion one way or another, but I don’t really have a problem with this. Of course, there’s some criticism that the money spent on private spaceflight could instead be used for more humanitarian projects, and there’s some truth in that. On the other hand, the cynical part of me points out that while humanitarian projects are a worthy goal, “this money should have been spent on the poor!” has nonetheless been a rallying cry for con men and thieves since the time of Judas Iscariot. And I admit that the sneering “tall poppy” reaction to what is a fairly remarkable achievement – the increasing privatization of spaceflight – makes me more sympathetic to it than I would be otherwise.

That said, I think the biggest long-term improvements in the human condition have come from better tools and better technology. Even a very poor person in many countries today has access to luxuries and goods that would have seemed unimaginable to a Roman emperor or a Bronze Age god-king.  That didn’t happen because we’re smarter or more moral than our ancestors, but because we have better technology, tools, and systems. I don’t think the value in space exploration comes from seeking out aliens or trying to build space colonies or any sort of Star Trek stuff, but in finding a way to tap the vast resources available in the solar system – practically limitless fresh water, minerals, and potential power generation. Think of all the problems that could be solved with an endless supply of fresh water or solar electricity, or if mining was done on asteroids instead of the Earth. Bezos also pointed out that it could be possible to move polluting industries into space, thereby eliminating a lot of environmental damage to Earth.

All this would, of course, only be possible with the democratization of space technology. Right now only powerful governments and billionaires can go to space. But that used to be true of air travel as well. Computers used to cost millions of dollars and have their own buildings, and recently I saw a teenager gazing slackly at a handheld computer (ie, a smartphone) as he went past on his skateboard. If he faceplanted and broke his phone, he could get another without much trouble, and his new phone would be infinitely more powerful than the old mainframe computers with their own buildings.

Overall, I think private spaceflight is a worthwhile experiment, though probably those of us reading this won’t see the benefits in our lifetimes. Obviously, this is all the first step in a long process, but I doubt the British scientists & technicians working on the Ultra project in World War II had any idea that their work was one of the first steps in the process that would lead to the Internet and the computer/tablet you are now reading this on.

So that’s what I think. However, given the historical reliability of science fiction writers’ predictions, it’s entirely possible that I am wrong. 🙂

-JM

8 thoughts on “Opinions IN SPACE!

  • Matthew Ferguson

    Given the historical reliability of science fiction writers’ predictions, it’s entirely possible that you are also right.

    Cell phones and tablet computers, 3D Printers and video calling all have one interesting thing in common; they were first seen in some form or fashion on Star Trek. Don’t knock too much on Sci-Fi.

    Reply
    • Jonathan Moeller

      I admit I was thinking about SF that predicted a nuclear war between the US and the Soviets in the 1980s or the 1990s, but I suspect SF has been better at predicting broad technological change than social or political change.

      Reply
  • Scott Osmond

    80 or 90 years back only the rich could afford a flight across the world. Now several hundred millions do this every year. Or at least they did before last year. A truly amazing amount of tech we use in our homes and workplaces every day came out of the various government run space programs. At least with billionaires paying for their own programs things might have a chance of being done and might even come in on budget! I’m very sympathetic of the idea of space mining and moving industry off world. There is more metal in one asteroid than humanity has mined in it’s entire history. Got to be better than sending kids down mines in Africa for cobalt and other metals used in renewables and smartphones.

    Reply
    • Jonathan Moeller

      That is a good point. One of the unfortunate truths of humanity is that in the aggregate we don’t abandon an immoral practice, such as slavery, out of conviction, but because a new tool or system has made the immoral practice obsolete and economically non-viable. Like, an individual could abandon an immoral practice out of conviction, but a society probably won’t until something better comes along to replace it.

      Reply
      • Scott Osmond

        Yes. It’s no coincidence that the antislavery movement really took off after the steamengine made slavery unnecessary. Each time I consider tech I thank god I was born in a time where it is as advanced as it is and not reliant on muscle power and the vagaries of the weather.

        Reply
  • Tarun Elankath

    Note that some of those UFO’s are un-explained by any known atmospheric phenomena and have been captured not by naked eyes but by US navy pilots
    https://www.npr.org/2021/06/25/1010382563/the-truth-is-still-out-there-report-says-it-didnt-find-evidence-ufos-were-aliens
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO_M0hLlJ-Q

    I will not be surprised if we are “under alien observation” at all. They probably have a no-interference policy though some renegades might occasionally want “human samples” for testing.

    Reply
    • Matthew Ferguson

      Or we’re like alien soap operas. “Check out what the crazy earthlings did tonight on Days of Alien Lives!” Heh. No way to know really.

      Wouldn’t that be hilarious though? Us being under surveillance by E.Ts version of the press?

      Reply
    • Jonathan Moeller

      I suspect if aliens do exist, they’re so different from humans as to be utterly incomprehensible to us. Like, every version of fictional aliens invented by the human imagination either contains some element of humanity (humanoid little gray men) or Earth biology (space bugs, etc.). If aliens do exist, they’re probably so alien that we literally cannot imagine what they are like.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *